All of Palestine for the Inhabitants of Palestine: The Legal Consequences of the Internationally Wrongful Act in the Establishment of Israel

Document Type : Original Article

Author

Associate Professor of International Law, University of Qom, Qom, Iran

Abstract

For thousands of years after the settlement of the Israelites in Canaan, the region hosted asmall Jewish population by the twentieth century. Claims of persecution, displacement, andhistorical ties to the land gave rise to the formation of a movement termed “World Zionism,”aimed at establishing a Jewish State in Palestine. The Balfour Declaration, issued by Britainin 1917, emphasized the necessity of creating a “Jewish National Home,” and the Leagueof Nations Mandate Agreement was subsequently concluded on this basis in 1922. Britain’scontradictory promises to Jews and Arabs led it to refer the Palestine question to the UnitedNations. Negotiations in the UN General Assembly resulted in the adoption of Resolution 181,known as the Partition Resolution, and the establishment of two States, Jewish and Arab, in1948. However, the creation of these two States appeared to violate the rights of the Palestinianinhabitants. Thus, in addressing the question of the legal consequences arising from theestablishment of Israel on land belonging to the Palestinian inhabitants, this study scrutinizes thehypothesis that the formation of Israel involved violations of certain rules of international law,rendering the United Nations and complicit states internationally responsible for this wrongfulact. To substantiate this hypothesis, a descriptive-analytical methodology was recruited. Thelegal framework applicable to Palestine included the Mandate system, the Mandate Agreement,and norms of international law, such as the UN Charter and human rights law. An interpretationof Article 22 of the Covenant of the League of Nations and Article 76 of the UN Charter indicatesthat sovereignty over mandated/trust territories must be vested in the “indigenous inhabitants”of those territories. Such sovereignty must be exercised over theentire territory. Moreover, thecreation of religious or racial states in the region constitutes a breach of the obligation of non-discrimination. Consequently, the establishment of Israel entails the international responsibilityof the UN and complicit states in the UN General Assembly. The legal consequences of thisresponsibility would includerestitution in integrum, reparations, non-recognition, and non-cooperation to ensure the return of “the entirety of Palestine’s sovereignty to its Palestinianinhabitants.”

Keywords

Main Subjects


  1. Adwan IMA, ‘All-Palestine Government Founding and Falling Prelimination and Factors’ (2022) 8(1) Intl J History & Cultural Stud 1

    Akram SM, ‘Palestinian Nationality and “Jewish” Nationality from the Lausanne Treaty to Today’ in Leila H Farsakh (ed), Rethinking Statehood in Palestine: Self-Determination and Decolonization Beyond Partition (University of California Press 2021)

    Bain W, Between Anarchy and Society: Trusteeship and the Obligations of Power (OUP 2003)

    Bell A and Kontorovich E, ‘Palestine, Uti Possidetis Juris and the Borders of Israel’ (2016) 58 Ariz L Rev 633

    Bentwich, N, The Mandates System (Longmans, Green 1930)

    Bentwich, Norman and Martin, Andrew, A Commentary on the Charter of the United Nations (Routledge & Kegan Paul Ltd 1950)

    Biger G, The Boundaries of Modern Palestine 1840-1947 (Routledge 2004)

    Cannizzaro E (ed), The Present and Future of Jus Cogens (Sapienza Università Editrice 2015)

    Cassese A, ‘The Israel-PLO Agreement and Self-Determination’ (1993) 4 EJIL 564

    Cattan H, Palestine and International Law: The Legal Aspects of the Arab-Israeli Conflict (Longman 1973)

    Crawford J, The Creation of States in International Law (2nd edn, OUP 2006)

    Etiger JF, ‘From Sacred Trust to Self-Determination’ (1977) 24 Netherlands Intl L Rev 85

    Farsoun SK, Culture and Customs of the Palestinians (Greenwood Press 2004)

    Fromkin D, A Peace to End All Peace: The Fall of the Ottoman Empire and the Creation of the Middle East (Holt Paperbacks 2001)

    Fripp E, Nationality and Statelessness in the International Law of Refugee Status (Hart Publishing 2016)

    Gadkowski T, ‘The Principle of Self-Determination in the Context of Human Rights’ (2017) 7 Adam Mickiewicz U L Rev 45

    Gavish D, A Survey of Palestine under the British Mandate, 1920–1948 (Routledge Curzon 2005)

    Ghasemi G, ‘The Palestinian People's Right to Armed Resistance from the Perspective of International Law’ (2024) 2(1) Iranian J Intl & Comparative L 1

    Göcke K, Indigenous Peoples in International Law (Göttingen University Press 2013)

    Green TA and Hartog H, ‘Law and Identifying Mandate Palestine’ in Thomas A Green and Hendrik Hartog (eds), Law in the Liberal Arts (Cornell University Press 2006)

    ———, Law and Identity in Mandate Palestine (University of North Carolina Press 2006)

    Kattan V, ‘The Empire Departs: The Partitions of British India, Mandate Palestine, and the Dawn of Self-Determination in the Third World’ (2018) 12(3) Asian J Middle E & Islamic Stud 1

    Laqueur W, A History of Zionism: From the French Revolution to the Establishment of the State of Israel (Schocken Books 2003)

    Leeper DS, ‘International Law-Trusteeship Compared with Mandate’ (1951) 49 Mich L Rev 1199

    Mandel D, H.V. Evatt and the Establishment of Israel the Undercover Zionist (PhD thesis, University of Melbourne 2004)

    Masalha N, Palestine: A Four Thousand Year History (Zed Books 2018)

    Masri M, ‘Constitutional Frameworks for a One-State Option in Palestine: An Assessment’ in Leila H Farsakh (ed), Rethinking Statehood in Palestine: Self-Determination and Decolonization Beyond Partition (University of California Press 2021)

    Matz N, ‘Civilization and the Mandate System under the League of Nations as Origin of Trusteeship’ (2005) 9 Max Planck UNYB 47

    McCarthy J, The Population of Palestine: Population History and Statistics of the Late Ottoman Period and the Mandate (Columbia University Press 1990)

    Moosavi SF and Khodaparast N, ‘Responsibility of Member States of International Organizations In light of International Law Commission Draft Articles on the Responsibility of International Organizations’ (2023) 18(64) Q J Judicial L Views 159 [In Persian]

    Nedeski N and Nollkaemper A, ‘Responsibility of International Organizations “in Connection with Acts of States”’ (2012) 9 Intl Orgs L Rev 33

    Pappe I, ‘Indigeneity as Resistance’ in Leila H Farsakh (ed), Rethinking Statehood in Palestine: Self-Determination and Decolonization Beyond Partition (University of California Press 2021)

    Penslar DJ, Israel in History: The Jewish State in Comparative Perspective (Routledge 2007)

    Quigley J, Palestine and Israel: A Challenge to Justice (Duke University Press 1990)

    Rabee N and Hammash A, ‘Palestinian Self-Determination: Land, People, and Practicality’ (Working Paper No 28, BADIL Resource Center for Palestinian Residency and Refugee Rights 2021)

    Reich B, A Brief History of Israel (2nd edn, Facts on File 2008)

    Reynold N, Britain’s Unfulfilled Mandate for Palestine (Lexington Books 2014)

    Robson L, Colonialism and Christianity in Mandate Palestine (University of Texas Press 2011)

    Sabbagh K, Palestine: History of a Lost Nation (Grove Press 2008)

    Saleh MM, History of Palestine: A Methodological Study of a Critical Issue (Al-Falah Foundation 2005)

    Segev T, One Palestine, Complete: Jews and Arabs under the Mandate (Metropolitan Books 2000)

    Seidl-Hohenveldern I, ‘Responsibility of Member States of an International Organization for Acts of that Organization’ in International Law at the Time of Its Codification: Essays in Honour of Roberto Ago (Giuffrè 1987) vol 3

    Shaw MN, ‘The Heritage of States: The Principle of Uti Possidetis Today’ (1996) 67 BYBIL 75

    Simma B, Mosler H, Paulus A and Chaitidou E, The Charter of the United Nations: A Commentary (2nd edn, OUP 2002) vol II

    Talmon S, ‘The Duty Not to ‘Recognize as Lawful’ a Situation Created by the Illegal Use of Force or Other Serious Breaches of a Jus Cogens Obligation’ in Christian Tomuschat and Jean-Marc Thouvenin (eds), The Fundamental Rules of the International Legal Order (Martinus Nijhoff 2005)

    Walter C, Von Ungern-Sternberg A and Abushov K, Self-Determination and Secession in International Law (OUP 2014)

    Watson I, Aboriginal Peoples, Colonialism and International Law: Raw Law (Routledge 2015)

    Yehoshua AB, Between Right and Right (Doubleday 1981)

    Zamani SG, ‘A Reflection on the International Responsibility of International Organizations’ [1997] Law J 236 [In Persian]

    1. B) International Cases

    Case Concerning the Frontier Dispute (Burkina Faso/Republic of Mali) (Judgment) [1986] ICJ Rep 554

    Certain Expenses of the United Nations (Article 17, paragraph 2, of the Charter) (Advisory Opinion) [1962] ICJ Rep 151

    Factory at Chorzów (Germany v Poland) (Jurisdiction) PCIJ Rep Series A No 9

    International Status of South-West Africa (Advisory Opinion) [1950] ICJ Rep 128

    Jurisdiction of the Courts of Danzig (Advisory Opinion) PCIJ Rep Series B No 15

    Kadi v European Commission (Joined Cases C-584/10 P, C-593/10 P and C-595/10 P) EU:C:2013:518

    Katkova v Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) (1997) 130 FTR 192 (Fed TD)

    Legal Consequences arising from the Policies and Practices of Israel in the Occupied Palestinian Territory, including East Jerusalem (Advisory Opinion) [2024] ICJ Rep

    Legal Consequences for States of the Continued Presence of South Africa in Namibia (South West Africa) notwithstanding Security Council Resolution 276 (1970) (Advisory Opinion) [1971] ICJ Rep 16

    Legal Consequences of the Construction of a Wall in the Occupied Palestinian Territory (Advisory Opinion) [2004] ICJ Rep 136

    Legal Consequences of the Separation of the Chagos Archipelago from Mauritius in 1965 (Advisory Opinion) [2019] ICJ Rep 95

    MZXLT v Minister for Immigration [2007] FMCA 799

    NAGV v Minister for Immigration [2005] HCA 6

    Nada v Switzerland App no 10593/08 (ECtHR [GC], 12 September 2012)

    Ruzhdi Saramati v France, Germany and Norway App no 71412/01 & 78166/01 (ECtHR, 2 May 2007)

    Western Sahara (Advisory Opinion) [1975] ICJ Rep 12

    Westland Helicopters Ltd v Arab Organisation for Industrialisation [1995] QB 282

    UNGA Res 1747 (XVI) (28 June 1962) GAOR 16th Session Supp 17, 65

    UNGA Res 181 (II) (29 November 1947) GAOR 2nd Session Resolutions, 131

    UNGA Res 1608 (XV) (21 April 1961) GAOR 15th Session Supp 16, 44

    UNGA Res 2504 (XXIV) (19 November 1969) GAOR 24th Session Supp 30, 2

    UNGA Res 752 (VIII) (9 December 1953) GAOR 8th Session Supp 17, 19

    UNGA Res 2200 A (XXI) (16 December 1966) GAOR 21st Session Supp 16, 49

    UNSC Res 47 (1948) (21 April 1948) UN Doc S/RES/47

    UNSC Res 51 (1948) (3 June 1948) UN Doc S/RES/51

    UNSC Res 242 (1967) (22 November 1967) UN Doc S/RES/242

    UNSC Res 278 (1970) (11 May 1970) UN Doc S/RES/278

    United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (adopted 13 September 2007) UNGA Res 61/295

    Ad Hoc Committee on the Palestinian Question, ‘Summary Report’ (15 October 1947) GA/PAL/16

    First Committee, General Assembly, ‘Verbatim Records of Meetings, 28 April-13 May 1947’ (1947) UN Doc A/C.1/XXX

    ILC, ‘Draft Articles on Responsibility of States for Internationally Wrongful Acts, with Commentaries’ (2001) UN Doc A/56/10

    League of Nations, Permanent Mandates Commission, ‘Report on the Work of the Fifth (Extraordinary) Session of the Commission’ (23 October–6 November 1924) League of Nations Doc C.648.M.237.1924.VI

    Martínez Cobo J, ‘Study of the Problem of Discrimination against Indigenous Populations’ (5 December 1986) UN Doc E/CN.4/Sub.2/1986/7/Add.4

    Permanent Mandates Commission, Minutes of the Thirty-Sixth Session (8-29 June 1939) League of Nations Doc C.250.M.150.1939.VI

    ‘Repertory of Practice of United Nations Organs’ (1945–1954) vol IV

    ‘Repertory of Practice of United Nations Organs’ (1966-1969) vol IV Suppl No 4

    Trusteeship Council, ‘Report Covering the Period from 23 July 1955 to 14 August 1956’ (14 August 1956) UN Doc A/3170

    ———, ‘Report Covering the Period from 17 July 1954 to 22 July 1955’ (22 July 1955) UN Doc A/2954

    ———, ‘Report to the Security Council on the Trust Territory of the Pacific Islands Covering the Period from 1 July 1967 to 19 June 1968’ (19 June 1968) UN Doc S/8624

    United Nations Special Committee on Palestine, ‘Report to the General Assembly’ (3 September 1947) UN Doc A/364

    The Chamizal Case (Mexico v United States) (1911) 11 RIAA 309