A Critical View towards U.S. Claim of Preemptive Self-Defense in the Assassination of General Qasem Soleimani

Document Type : Original Article


1 Criminal Law Researcher

2 Associate Professor, International Law, Hazrat-e Masoumeh University, Qom, Iran


The reason claimed by the Government of the United States (hereinafter the US) for the assassination of General Qasem Soleimani (General Soleimani) was to prevent imminent attacks. This allegation implicitly evokes the Doctrine of "Preemptive Self-Defense". This article evaluates the US claim in the attack of General Soleimani as a preemptive self-defense through a critical analysis. The US resort to the doctrine of preemptive self-defense for the assassination lacks legal validity and is especially contrary to the provisions of the UN Charter, particularly Article (51). This assassination can be considered the illegal use of force by the US. According to the principle of prohibition on the use of force in international law practice, any premeditated attack before the beginning of armed aggression is not considered self-defense. Moreover, the US evidence in proving an imminent strike from General Soleimani is inadequate and unjustifying.


Main Subjects

  1. Bishop W, International Law: Cases and Materials, Boston, (Brown Company 2001)
  2. Bowett W, Self-Defense in International Law, Manchester, (Manchester University Press 1958)
  3. Brownlie I., International Law and the Use of the Force by States, (Oxford, Clarendon Press 1963)
  4. Cassese A, International Law in a Divided World, Translated by Morteza Kalantarian, (Office of International Law Services of the Islamic Republic of Iran 1991)
  5. Clayton T, ‘Killing of Qasem Soleimani; Frequently Asked Questions’, (2020), Congressional Research Service (CRS)
  6. Delahunty R and Yoo J, ‘The Bush Doctrine: Can Preventive War Be Justified’, (2009), 32 Harv. J. L. & Pub. Pol'y
  7. Dinstein Y, War, Aggression and Self-defense, (Cambridge University Press 2005)
  8. Fazaeli M, ‘The Assassination of General Soleimani from the Perspective of International Law on the Use of Force’, (2021), Year 7, Issue 2, Quarterly Journal of Comparative Research in Islamic and Western Law
  9. Frizli N, Edition du moude Arab; the Iran-Iraq conflict, Institute of Studies and Research, (Paris 1981)
  10. Fry J, ‘Terrorism as a crime against humanity and genocide: the back door to universal jurisdiction’, (2003), UCLA Journal of International Law and Foreign Affairs
  11. Glennon M, The Blank Prose Crime of Aggression, (Yale International Law 2010)
  12. Gray C, International Law and Use of Force, (Oxford University Press 2000)
  13. International Court of Justice (ICJ) Reports, https://www.icj-cij.org/en/annual-reports.
  14. Jalali M and Zabib R, ‘Evaluation of preventive defense against terrorism’, (2019), No. 82, Volume 23, Quarterly Journal of Judicial Legal Perspectives
  15. Jennings R, ‘The Caroline and McLoad Cases’, (1938), no.32, American Journal of International Law
  16. Karamzadeh S, ‘Terrorism and self Defense in International Law’, (2003), No. 28, Volume 7, Quarterly Journal of Teacher of Humanities
  17. Mousavi S F and Hatami M, ‘Preliminary Self-Defense in International Law’, (2006), No. 72, Journal of the Faculty of Law and Political Science, University of Tehran
  18. Mumtaz J and Saberi Ansari B, ‘The effect of the next practice of governments on the principle of prohibition of threats and use of force’, (2012), Strategy Quarterly
  19. Murphy S, ‘Terrorism and the concept of armed attack in article 51 of the UN charter’, (2005), No. 43, Harvard International Law
  20. O’Connell M E, The Myth of Preemptive Self-Defense, (ASIL Publication 2002)
  21. Rasooli Thanieabadi E, Introduction to the most important concepts and terms of international relations, (1st ed, Tehran, Tisa Publication 2014)
  22. Rosand E, ‘Security Council Resolution 1373, the Counter - Terrorism Committee, and the Fight against Terrorism’, (2003), Vol. 97, the American Journal of International Law
  23. Saed N, ‘The Right to Use Force in the Context of International Developments; Critical Evaluation of the Report of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees’, (2005), No. 8, Journal of Legal Research
  24. Schuster M, ‘The Rome statute, crime of aggression, a gordian knot in search of sword’, (2003)
  25. Sharifi Tarazkoohi H and Chaharbakhsh V, ‘Legitimate Deterrent Defense in the 21st Century’, (2013), Year 15, Issue 40, Quarterly Journal of Public Law Research
  26. Shaw M, International Law, (Cambridge University Press 2008)
  27. Taleghani H and Namamian P, ‘Applying preemptive defense in the fight against terrorism; Denial or Proof of Legitimacy’, (2013), No. 16, Volume 4, Quarterly Journal of International Police Studies
  28. Wallace R, and Ortega O, International law, (University of Glasgow 2019)
  29. Warren A and Bode I, Governing the Use of Force in International Relations, (Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2021)
  30. Ziai bigdeli M R, International Public Law, (Ganje Danesh Publication 2019)