Sovereignty over Islands in the Light of the Jurisprudence of the International Court of Justice: A Case Study of the Iranian Three Islands in the Persian Gulf

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Master's degree student in international law, Faculty of Law, University of Qom, Qom, Iran

2 Assistant Professor, Department of International Law, Faculty of Law, University of Qom, Qom, Iran

Abstract

Territorial issues are among the most sensitive issues in international law, where non-intervention and respect for territorial integrity are crucial. The International Court of Justice (ICJ) has developed consistent jurisprudence emphasizing treaties, effective and continuous exercise of sovereignty, and tacit acquiescence in determining territorial title. This study applies these principles to the sovereignty of Iran over the three Iranian islands of Abu Musa, Greater Tunb, and Lesser Tunb. Although not formally submitted to the ICJ, the question of sovereignty over islands can be analyzed in light of the Court’s precedents, highlighting the significance of tangible governmental acts—administrative, military, economic, and legal—in establishing ownership. Mere historical claims without effective control hold little weight in international law. The findings indicate that Iran’s effective, manifest, and continuous sovereignty over the three islands consolidates its ownership, and the interruption caused by the British occupation does not impair this sovereignty and title. The UAE’s historical claims predating its establishment cannot be relied upon before the Court because the acts occurred during occupation (not colonial rule) and are inconsistent with historical and formal documents confirming Iran’s sovereign and ownership rights over the islands.

Keywords

Main Subjects


Ebrahim Baigzadeh, International Law: Volume II – Relations of Subjects (Mizan Publishing 2022) [in Persian]
Ian Brownlie, International Law in the Last Years of the Twentieth Century (S R Pish Robat tr, Office of Political and International Studies 2004) [in Persian]
Charles L O Buderi and Luciana T Ricart, The Iran-UAE Gulf Islands Dispute: A Journey through International Law, History and Politics (Brill Nijhoff 2018)
Frauke Heard-Bey, From the Trucial States to the United Arab Emirates (Motivate 2004)
Robert Y Jennings, The Acquisition of Territory in International Law (Manchester University Press 1963)
Malcolm N Shaw, International Law (8th edn, Cambridge University Press 2017)
Nasser Tabrasa, The Three Islands of the Persian Gulf: A Historical-Legal Study (Abrar Moaser Cultural Institute for International Studies and Research 2011) [in Persian]
Mohammad Reza Ziaei Baigdeli and others, Advisory Opinions and Judgments of the International Court of Justice (vols 1–4, Allameh Tabataba’i University Press 2013) [in Persian]
Abdulhadi H Al-Qahtani, ‘The Iranian Occupation of the Three Emirati Islands and the Arab and International Reactions’ (2002) Journal of Gulf and Arabian Peninsula Studies <https://doi.org/10.34120/jgaps.v28i107.1591> [in Arabic]
H Anari, ‘The Principle of Uti Possidetis from the Perspective of the International Court of Justice’ (2018) Proceedings of the National Conference on New Global Achievements in Education, Psychology, Law, and Cultural and Social Studies [in Persian]
Paul K Huth, Sarah E Croco and Benjamin J Appel, ‘Does International Law Promote the Peaceful Settlement of International Disputes?’ (2011) American Political Science Review
Marcelo G Kohen, ‘Possession, Prescription and Uti Possidetis in International Law’ (2006) British Yearbook of International Law
F Lotfi, ‘The Concept of Recognition of States and Governments in the International Legal System’ (2019) Ghanoon Yar International Journal
H A Muslim, ‘Kuwait’s Position on the Iranian Occupation of the Three Emirati Islands (Greater Tunb – Lesser Tunb – Abu Musa): A Historical Study’ (2022) Ibn Khaldoun Journal for Studies and Research [in Arabic]
M Saber Rad, ‘The Principle of Legal Possession and Its Application in Territorial and Boundary Cases of the International Court of Justice’ (2020) Ta’ali-ye Hoquq (Legal Excellence) [in Persian]
‘ICJ Ruling on the Territorial and Maritime Dispute between Nicaragua and Honduras’ (22 February 2025) Public International Law Blog <https://internationallaw.blogfa.com/post/369> [in Persian]
Yousuf Ebrahim Al-Naqbi, The Sovereignty Dispute over the Gulf Islands: Abu Musa, Greater and Lesser Tunbs (PhD thesis, University of Glasgow 1998) <https://theses.gla.ac.uk/2534/>
Case Concerning the Mavrommatis Palestine Concessions (Greece v United Kingdom) (1924) PCIJ Rep Series A No 2
Kasikili/Sedudu Island (Botswana v Namibia) (Judgment) ICJ Rep 1045 <https://www.icj-cij.org/en/case/98>
Territorial and Maritime Dispute between Nicaragua and Honduras in the Caribbean Sea (Nicaragua v Honduras) (Judgment) ICJ Rep <https://www.icj-cij.org/en/case/133>
Territorial and Maritime Dispute (Nicaragua v Colombia) (Preliminary Objections) ICJ Rep
Territorial and Maritime Dispute (Nicaragua v Colombia) (Judgment) ICJ Rep
United Nations General Assembly and Security Council, ‘Letter dated 15 September 1992 from the Permanent Representative of Qatar to the United Nations addressed to the Secretary-General’ UN Doc A/47/449, S/24566 (15 September 1992)
United Nations Security Council, ‘Letter dated 23 October 2014 from the Permanent Representative of the United Arab Emirates to the United Nations addressed to the Secretary-General’ UN Doc S/2014/759 (23 October 2014)
United Nations Security Council, ‘Letter dated 10 December 2015 from the Permanent Representative of Saudi Arabia to the United Nations addressed to the President of the Security Council’ UN Doc S/2015/954 (10 December 2015) <http://undocs.org/S/2015/954>
United Nations Security Council, ‘Letter dated 9 February 2016 from the Permanent Representative of the Islamic Republic of Iran to the United Nations addressed to the Secretary-General’ UN Doc S/2016/131 (9 February 2016)
 Marquess of Salisbury, ‘Enclosing Instructions to Mr Churchill, 14 August 1888, and his Report, 26 August 1888’ (27 August 1888) R/15/1/196