The Interwar Otherwise: Rewriting Liberal Histories of International Law

Document Type : Original Article

Author

Professor of International Law, Sciences Po Law School and University of Manchester, England.

Abstract

This article critically examines the mainstream international legal narrative of the interwar period,arguing that it functions not as a neutral recounting of the past but as a strategic intervention thatgoverns the present. The conventional story—centered on collective security, codification ofrestraints on war, the mandates system, and minority protection—is shown to be a distinctlyliberal construction. It presumes a liberal concept of law and treats peace and security as law’snatural horizon, thereby sidelining the era’s competing legalities: economic ordering andtechnocracy, racialized governance and imperial extraction, social rights internationalism andlabor constitutionalism, emergency as a legal technology, and administrative internationalismacross finance, health, and trade. In this sense, the interwar as conventionally narrated is largelya self-description of liberal legalism, not a transparent periodization.The article advances twoclaims. First, that this narrative framing narrows what counts as international legality andnaturalizes particular institutional forms. Second, that in 2025—amid fraying constitutionaldemocratic orders, notably in parts of the Global North—we must reinvent our narratives. Thismeans foregrounding legal architectures that structured social conflict and authority beyondthe security frame: debt, trade, and resource governance; race and empire within internationaladministration; emergency and technocratic expertise; and rival internationalisms. Rewritingthe interwar is not antiquarian labor but a practical intervention to enable the strategic work ofhistory in constituting the horizon of the possible.

Keywords

Main Subjects


Agamben Giorgio, Homo Sacer: Sovereign Power and Bare Life (Stanford University Press 1998)
Akami Tomoko, Institutionalizing the Asia-Pacific: Diplomatic Networks and the International Order, 1919–1941 (Routledge 2002)
Benton Lauren, A Search for Sovereignty (Cambridge University Press 2010)
Blackett Melanie, Everyday Transgressions (Cornell University Press 2019)
Boris Eileen and Klein Susan, Caring for America (Oxford University Press 2012)
d’Aspremont Jean, The Critical Attitude and the History of International Law (Brill 2019)
Fink Carole, Defending the Rights of Others: The Great Powers, the Jews, and International Minority Protection, 1878–1938 (Cambridge University Press 2004)
Foucault Michel, Society Must Be Defended (Picador 1997)
Gammeltoft-Hansen Thomas and Hathaway James, ‘Non-Refoulement in a World of Cooperative Deterrence’, in Columbia Journal of Transnational Law 53 (2015) 235–284
Heathcote Gina, Feminist Dialogues on International Law (Oxford University Press 2019)
Holborn Louise, The International Refugee Organization: A Specialized Agency of the United Nations, Its History and Work (1946–1952) (Oxford University Press 1956)
Kapoor Nisha, Deport, Deprive, Extradite (Verso 2018)
Kennedy Duncan, A Critique of Adjudication (Harvard University Press 1997)
Kennedy Duncan, The Dark Sides of Virtue: Reassessing International Humanitarianism (Princeton University Press 2004)
Koskenniemi Martti, From Apology to Utopia: The Structure of International Legal Argument (Cambridge University Press 2005)
Koskenniemi Martti, To the Uttermost Parts of the Earth: Legal Imagination and International Power 1300–1870 (Cambridge University Press 2021)
Lohr Eric, Nationalizing the Russian Empire: The Campaign against Enemy Aliens during World War I (Harvard University Press 2003)
Macklin Audrey, ‘Citizenship Revocation, the Privilege to Have Rights and the Production of the Alien’, Queen’s Law Journal 40 (2014) 1–54
Marks Susan, The Riddle of All Constitutions: International Law, Democracy, and the Critique of Ideology (Oxford University Press 2000)
Marrus Michael, The Unwanted: European Refugees in the Twentieth Century (Oxford University Press 1985)
Marrus Michael and Paxton Robert, Vichy France and the Jews (Stanford University Press 1995)
Meierhenrich Jens and Simons Oliver, eds., The Oxford Handbook of Carl Schmitt (Oxford University Press 2016)
Miéville China, Between Equal Rights: A Marxist Theory of International Law (Brill 2005)
Mitchell R., Recentering the World: China and the Transformation of International Law (Cambridge University Press 2022)
Mälksoo Lauri, Russian Approaches to International Law (Oxford University Press 2015)
Moyn Samuel, The Last Utopia (Harvard University Press 2010)
Orford Anne, International Authority and the Responsibility to Protect (Cambridge University Press 2011)
Pedersen Susan, The Guardians: The League of Nations and the Crisis of Empire (Oxford University Press 2015)
Rygiel Philippe, Le droit d’asile en France (1793–1993) (L’Harmattan 1996)
Tazzioli Martina, The Making of Migration: The Biopolitics of Mobility at Europe’s Borders (Sage 2020)
Weil Patrick, How to Be French: Nationality in the Making since 1789 (Duke University Press 2008)
Zedner Lucia, ‘Securing Liberty in the Face of Terror’, Journal of Law and Society 32 (2005) 507–533
Anghie Antony, ‘Time, Colonialism, and the Critique of International Law’, in Fassbender and Peters, eds., The Oxford Handbook of the History of International Law (Oxford University Press 2012) 1035–1057
Benjamin Walter, ‘Critique of Violence’, in Bullock and Jennings, eds., Walter Benjamin: Selected Writings, vol. 1 (Harvard University Press 1996) 236–252
d’Aspremont Jean, ‘Critical histories of international law and the repression of disciplinary imagination’ (2019) 7 London Review of International Law 89–115
d’Aspremont Jean, International Legal Methods: Working for a Tragic and Cynical Routine, in Deplano Rossana and Tsagourias Nicholas, eds., Handbook on Research Methods in International Law (Elgar 2020)
d’Aspremont Jean, ‘The Imperial Peacecraft of International Law’, in Gattini Andrea, ed., La pace: bene supremo del diritto internazionale e dell’unione europea (forthcoming 2026)
d’Aspremont Jean, ‘The League of Nations and the Power of “Experiment Narratives” in International Institutional Law’ (2020) 22 International Community Law Review 275–290
d’Aspremont Jean, ‘The Love for International Organizations’ (2023) 20 International Organizations Law Review 111
d’Aspremont Jean, ‘Consenting to International Law in Five Moves’, in Besson Samantha, ed., Consent in International Law (Cambridge University Press 2023) 117–134
Bigo Didier, ‘Security and Immigration’ (2002) 27 Alternatives 63–92
Fink Carole, Defending the Rights of Others, Cambridge University Press 2004, ch. 8
Lohr Eric, Nationalizing the Russian Empire, ch. 7
Macklin Audrey, ‘Citizenship Revocation, the Privilege to Have Rights and the Production of the Alien’, Queen’s Law Journal 40 (2014) 1–54
d’Aspremont Jean, International Legal Methods: Working for a Tragic and Cynical Routine (Elgar 2020).